A pair of Republican lawmakers are demanding the UN nuclear watchdog monitoring Iran’s nuclear facilities to clarify Tehran’s role in the inspections, The Hill reported.
The two lawmakers said the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) should be upfront about Iran’s role given the controversy surrounding side deals between Tehran and the IAEA signed during negotiations between Iran and the U.S. and five other countries.
“We ask that you … fully explain the role Iran plays in verifying its nuclear facilities under the secret side deals Iran and the IAEA have concluded, and affirm that this arrangement in no way is precedent setting for future inspections of any kind,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) wrote in a letter to Yukiya Amano, the IAEA’s director general.
The letter comes amid reports that Iran took samples at Parchin, a controversial military site, without the presence of IAEA inspectors. While Parchin is a military facility, Iran is suspected of carrying out tests related to nuclear bomb detonations there.
In light of his comments last week, Cotton and Pompeo also want him to clarify comments he made in August that he was “disturbed by statements suggesting that the IAEA has given responsibility for nuclear inspections to Iran.”
Amano’s August remarks came after The Associated Press reported that Iran will be allowed to use its own experts to look for signs of nuclear weapons work at Parchin. The AP originally referred to Parchin as a nuclear facility.
The side deals between Iran and the IAEA have been a focus of lawmakers opposed to the Iran nuclear deal. Under the agreement, Iran accepts limits on its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), as well as Republicans in the House, pushed congressional leadership to delay the 60-day review period, arguing that the administration violated the law by not handing over the side deals.
Meanwhile, Cotton and Pompeo have fired off a string of letters to administration and IAEA officials pushing for additional information on the agreements.
They added in Monday’s letter that any deal that excludes IAEA inspectors “sets a dangerous precedent for future inspections, whether related to settling outstanding PMD issues or verification issues that arise after Implementation Day of the JCPOA, and undermines the credibility of the IAEA.”
