While many issues still unresolved, Secretary of State John Kerry says Iran nuclear talks have ’made progress’
A senior European official says his government wants the terms of an Iran nuclear deal toughened
A deadline in Iran nuclear talks is just days away
Los Angeles Times – March 20, 2015 - High-level negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program appeared to slow on Thursday, and U.S. officials said any potential agreement would restrict Tehran’s nuclear activities longer than 10 or 15 years, the expected duration of the pact.
Diplomats from Iran, the United States and five other world powers are trying to complete the outline of a deal by the end of March. But the group still hasn’t begun working from a draft and continues to debate major issues, a senior U.S. official said.
Negotiators are “still a distance” from a deal, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif told reporters.
In Washington, Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken sought to ease concern that Iran would be free to build a nuclear weapon when the expected agreement expires in a decade or more.
Blinken said Iran’s nuclear activities would face a variety of restrictions indefinitely, including tough monitoring and inspections, to thwart any attempt by Tehran to build a bomb.
“Some constraints would be removed after a significant period of time, others would remain in effect even longer, and some would last indefinitely, including a stringent and intrusive monitoring and inspections regime,” Blinken told the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
The United States, France, Britain, Germany, Russia and China have been negotiating with Iran for 18 months for a deal that would ease economic sanctions on Iran if it agrees to verifiable limits on enriching uranium and other nuclear activities.
The duration of those restrictions has been controversial from the start.
Blinken said the end date of the deal hadn’t been finalized. Iran has sought an end to the deal and all restrictions on its nuclear program in seven years.
Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton), chairman of the House foreign affairs committee, said Thursday that he doubted inspections and other long-term restrictions would prevent Iran from gaining a bomb-making capability should it choose to do so.
He said Iran has been violating its commitments under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty for years. Iran says its nuclear program is only for civilian purposes.
The expected deal would impose a cap on Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium to try to ensure Tehran couldn’t accumulate enough fuel to produce a single bomb in less than a year, the so-called breakout period.
The mood of the talks in this upscale lakeside city took a turn for the worse after earlier upbeat announcements.
A senior European official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the closed-door talks, said his government was unhappy with the terms on the table and could not support them in their present form. He told reporters that a variety of issues remain to be settled.
The senior U.S. official, in Switzerland for the talks, also sought to deflect speculation that key details have been settled, saying in a statement that “the fundamental framework issues are still under comprehensive discussion; there is no draft document being circulated.” The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss closed-door talks.
The most important outstanding issues are restrictions on Iran’s nuclear research and development, and how quickly sanctions will be lifted, especially those imposed by the United Nations, diplomats said.
But to resolve those disputes, the group might adjust the terms on other matters that have been debated and settled.